|
|
 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
| |
Histology. “In vivo” studies. |
|
|
|
| |
Various
histomorphometric studies have been carried out. They all have
shown (See tables below):
Details
of those studies can be found in:
 |
Comparative histomorphometric study of five different dental implant surface treatments in Beagle dogs. M.A.de Maeztu, I.Braceras, J. I. Alava, M.A. Sánchez-Garcés, C.Gay-Escoda |
 |
 |
 |
Histomorphometric study of ion implantation and diamond-like carbon (DLC) as dental implant surface treatments in Beagle dogs. M.A. de Maeztu, I. Braceras, J.I. Alava, M.A., C. Cosme Gay-Escoda. |
 |
 |
 |
Interaction of engineered surfaces with the living world: ion implantation vs. osseointegration. I. Braceras, J.I. Alava, L. Goikoetxea, M.A. de Maeztu, J.I. Onate. |
 |
 |
 |
Ion Implantation:
Surface Treatment for improving the bone integration
of titanium and Ti6Al4V
dental
implants. M. A. de Maeztu, J. I. Álava, C. Gay-Escoda. Clin.
Oral Impl. Res 14, 2003; 57-62. |
 |
 |
 |
Improved osseointegration in
ion implantation treated dental implants. I.Braceras,
J.I.Alava, J.I.Oñate, M.Brizuela, A.García- Luis, N.Garagorri, J.L.Viviente y M.A.de
Maeztu. Surface and Coatings Technology 158-159 (2002) 28-32. |
 |
 |
 |
“in
vivo” tests of ion implantation vs commercially surface treated dental
implants. I.Braceras, MA de Maeztu, JI Alava, C Gay-Escoda,
MA Sanchez. 12th Annual
Scientific Congress of the EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR OSSEOINTEGRACION,
2003, Vienna. |
|
|
|
|